Legal Opinion
Hartter v. Apfel
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 24, 1999No. 95-4184-RDRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the court upon plaintiffs renewed application for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and plaintiffs renewed motion for fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1).
I
This case has long and protracted history. Plaintiff filed this action seeking social security disability benefits on November 17,1995, Plaintiff filed his initial brief on July 1, 1996. In that brief, plaintiff argued that the final decision of the Commissioner was not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- William R. HUBBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Hayes v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Ground v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard H. Frazier v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Lowe v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- ZIA HOSPICE, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Frazier v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000