Legal Opinion

William R. HUBBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1993No. 93-7011PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal contests the award of attorney’s fees in a social security case. The district court granted plaintiffs motion for fees under § 206(b)(1) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), but declined to enhance the fee as permitted by the Act. Because we find no abuse of discretion in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Jeter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Richard H. Frazier v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Russell v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API