Legal Opinion
Ground v. Sullivan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 16, 1992No. 89-1453-B(M)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC GRANTING PLAINTIFF COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,-518.20
BREWSTER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner Ground is a former telephone operator who sought disability benefits pursuant the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. On July 1, 1991, the AD concluded that Ms. Ground was not disabled within the meaning of the Act between the period of November 21,1987 and May 31, 1989. Plaintiff then filed a complaint in this court under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the Secretary’s decision.
This court’s Order of January 2, 1991, took the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Pacifica, LLC. v. City of PacificaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Hartter v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Lowe v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- County of Santa Cruz, Cal. v. AshcroftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004