Legal Opinion

Marriage of Bowers v. Bowers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. 92-DO-0456-ST; CA A84593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Husband moves for reconsideration of our decision, Bowers and Bowers, 136 Or App 112, 900 P2d 1085 (1995), claiming that we made a factual error in disposing of his. claim for attorney fees. We allow the motion and modify our opinion to remand to award husband attorney fees.

In our opinion, we stated:

“In his amended response and cross-petition, husband requested that ‘the property and debts of the parties be distributed in accordance with the pre-marital agreement of the parties.’ He requested, however, that wife be required to pay his reasonable attorney fees, ‘pursuant to ORS 107.105(l)(i).’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API