Legal Opinion
Marriage of Bowers v. Bowers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 28, 1996No. 92-DO-0456-ST; CA A84593PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Husband moves for reconsideration of our decision, Bowers and Bowers, 136 Or App 112, 900 P2d 1085 (1995), claiming that we made a factual error in disposing of his. claim for attorney fees. We allow the motion and modify our opinion to remand to award husband attorney fees.
In our opinion, we stated:
“In his amended response and cross-petition, husband requested that ‘the property and debts of the parties be distributed in accordance with the pre-marital agreement of the parties.’ He requested, however, that wife be required to pay his reasonable attorney fees, ‘pursuant to ORS 107.105(l)(i).’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997