Legal Opinion

State v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1999No. C7-99-378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge

Appellant Jason Dewayne Schwartz challenges the district court’s revocation of his probation. The district court conditioned probation upon appellant’s successful completion of a sex-offender treatment program. Appellant claims that because his failure to complete a sex-offender treatment program was the result of his refusal to admit the offenses of his conviction, the district court violated his freedom of conscience under Article 1, Section 16 of the Minnesota Constitution, and his right to due process when it revoked his probation. We affirm.

FACTS

On August 23, 1996,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. WelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API