Legal Opinion
Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, Maplewood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1992No. C3-90-2617PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
The Minnesota Federation of Teachers, on behalf of certain lay employees of Hill-Murray High School, petitioned the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services (Bureau) for determination of an appropriate bargaining unit and certification as exclusive representative under the provisions of the Minnesota Labor Relations Act (MLRA or Act), Minn.Stat. § 179.01-17 (1990). Hill-Murray High School (Hill-Murray) moved to dismiss the petition and asserted that Bureau jurisdiction would directly infringe upon their rights under both the federal and state constitutions. The Bureau…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People of Guam v. Benny Toves GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Geraci v. EckankarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Lunde v. HelmsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.