Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Gilbert

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1972No. Civ. 27925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, J.

This medical malpractice action was commenced against A. E. Gilbert, M. D., Napa Medical Group, and others, on behalf of Paul Wilson, a minor (to whom we hereinafter refer as “Paul” or “respondent”). Dr. Gilbert and Napa Medical Group appeal from a $300,000 judgment entered against them upon, a jury verdict finding them liable in that amount.

The medical evidence consists exclusively of the testimony of Paul’s father, Dr. Gilbert, Dr. Cofer, and Dr. Nobis. All were called by respondent; appellants called no medical witnesses, and Dr. Gilbert testified only under call by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Yolo Water & Power Co. v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Henninger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosener v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Fox v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dincau v. TamayoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Schiernbeck v. HaightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API