Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1989No. 85-603PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Martin was convicted of first-degree felony murder while armed 1 and first-degree burglary while armed. 2 On appeal Martin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession. Martin contends that his arrest was not based on probable cause and that the police lacked consent to enter his grandparents’ home to make the arrest. Consequently, he maintains, the confession which he gave later at the police station was the fruit of an illegal arrest and should have been suppressed.

We hold, first of all, that appellant has standing to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. HubbelMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Bryant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API