Rose v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
After his convictions for distribution of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute, D.C.Code § 33 — 541(a)(1) (1988 Repl.), appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress tangible evidence and an out-of-court identification. He argues that the trial court should have excluded this evidence because the police obtained it as a result of a war-rantless entry into his aunt and uncle’s apartment. The government replies that appellant lacks standing to object to the warrantless entry. We conclude that the record requires us to hold that…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Randolph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.