Legal Opinion

State v. Hubbel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1997No. 96-663PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Defendant Wesley Carter Hubbel (Hubbel) was charged with aggravated assault, a felony, after an incident in which he shot his wife, Carole Hubbel. He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized at his home during a warrantless search on the ground that it violated his constitutional rights. The District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, denied his motion. A jury subsequently returned a guilty verdict. Hubbel now appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We frame the issues as follows:

1. Was the warrantless search and seizure…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ReesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. BassettMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API