LaFlamme v. Hoffman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMerrill, J.
On exceptions. This was a real action brought to recover a parcel of real estate situate in Portland in our County of Cumberland, of which the plaintiff claims the defendant had disseized him. The declaration in the action is in proper form and alleges that the plaintiff, within twenty years last past, was seized of the premises in question in fee simple. The writ was returnable to, and entered in the Superior Court in the County of Cumberland at the May 1952 Term thereof. At the June Term, by agreement of the parties, the case was referred under rule of court, with right of exceptions as to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- De Cicco v. . SchweizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Chapman v. BomannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Greene v. WilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Estate of Carroll G. Frye v. MMG Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.