Legal Opinion

State v. David

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 8, 2006No. 33403-8-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 Andrew David appeals his conviction and sentence for vehicular homicide, resulting from his speeding vehicle’s collision with another vehicle while driving with his blood alcohol level at twice the legal limit. He argues that (1) the vehicular homicide statute violates the separation of powers doctrine, (2) the trial court abused its *473discretion when it (a) admitted into evidence a photograph of the victim when she was alive and unharmed and (b) refused to admit into evidence the victim’s toxicology report, (3) the trial court failed to instruct the jury on how to determine whether a blood…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. A.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State Of Washington v. Docie BurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API