Legal Opinion

State v. Christman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 17, 2011No. 28609-6-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 P.3d 680 (2011)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Corey (NMI) CHRISTMAN, Appellant.

No. 28609-6-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

March 17, 2011.

Susan Marie Gasch, Gasch Law Office, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Carole Louise Highland, Attorney at Law, D. Angus Lee, Grant County Prosecuting Attorney, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.

SIDDOWAY, J.

¶ 1 Delivering a controlled substance that is used by the person to whom it was delivered, resulting in the death of the user, is punishable as controlled substances homicide. Corey Christman appeals his conviction for the crime, contending (1)…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. PinkermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. PenningtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API