State v. Christman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Delivering a controlled substance that is used by the person to whom it was delivered, resulting in the death of the user, is punishable as controlled substances homicide. Corey Christman appeals his conviction for the crime, contending (1) that in order to prove the “results in *745death” element, the State was required to prove that the user’s death was proximately caused by the drug he delivered and, given evidence that other substances contributed to the death in this case, the evidence was insufficient and (2) alternatively, that the statute establishing the crime is unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BauerWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Jerry L. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.