Legal Opinion

In Re the Sales & Use Tax Refund Request of Media One, Inc., License No. 51-0180701-ST

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 19401, 19411PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] The Department of Revenue appeals a circuit court decision which reversed an administrative determination that the taxpayer was not entitled to a sales tax refund. We agree with the Department that the sales tax exemption for advertising services does not include the sale of certain tangible personal property by the advertising agency. By notice of review, taxpayer challenges the timeliness of Department’s appeal and the appropriate standard of review.

FACTS

[¶ 2] In November of 1993, Media One, Inc. (Media One), an advertising agency in Sioux Falls, sought a refund of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Interstate Printing Co. v. Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pledger v. Baldor International, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Nilson v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Real Estate Tax Exemption for Black Hills Legal Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Poindexter v. Hand County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Robinson & Muenster Associates, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Voeltz v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Butler MacHinery Co. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API