Legal Opinion

Maurice Anton Kienlen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1967No. 9104PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

Appellant was sentenced on a plea of guilty to a one count indictment charging him and a co-defendant with bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d). He filed a motion for a new trial which was also treated by the court as notice of appeal. The motion for new trial was overruled because untimely filed, but the appeal was allowed. Counsel was appointed and the appeal perfected to this court. Contemporaneously with his motion for new trial, appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the sentencing court which was treated as a 2255 motion to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Thomas W. Whalem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Bartone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. David W. Wion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Scott Brian JanoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Albert Curtis v. Hon. John Zelker, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. State v. GroshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API