Legal Opinion

Staats v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2000No. 65681-9PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

A riverbank confrontation between property owner Jack Staats and fish and wildlife officer James Brown spawned this action for false arrest, false imprisonment, assault and battery, and violation of the federal Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At issue is whether a fish and wildlife officer may effect a warrantless arrest for unlawful resistance based upon failure to provide information; whether this arrest, lawful or not, was accomplished through the use of excessive force; and, ultimately, whether Officer Brown enjoys immunity from suit under state and/or federal law. The trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Mattos v. AgaranoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Luchtel v. HagemannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. OrtegaWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API