Legal Opinion

Allsep v. DANIEL CONST. CO.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 1950No. 16311PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

The Industrial Commission made an award of workmen’s compensation to appellant which was reversed by the lower court, whence this appeal. Claimant had been working two weeks as a laborer for Daniel Construction Company, which is a building contractor. It was erecting houses at a cotton mill and claimant and three other employees were moving sheetrock by truck from a warehouse to the job. In the unloading process he and one other stood on the truck, toward the cab, and pushed the pieces of material to the rear of the truck where the two other members of the crew received and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. Borden Mills, Inc. v. McGahaTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stone v. Traylor Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Jordan v. Dixie Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. McCoy v. Easley Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Nicholson v. S.C. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API