Legal Opinion
Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 17, 1944No. 15692PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Associate Justice Eishburne
delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court reversing an award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1942, § 7035-1 et seq. The hearing commissioner found that the deceased, Joe M. Eargle, met his death by “accident arising out of and in the course of his employment,”, and the appellant was accordingly allowed compensation for the death of her husband. On appeal the full commission affirmed this award.
There is no 'substantial disagreement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Gallman v. Springs MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Douglas v. Spartan Mills, Startex DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- United States Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Loges v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.