Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Easley Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1950No. 16446PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxntr, Justice.

This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1942, § 7035-1 et seq. Claimant, Broadus McCoy, was employed at the Easley plant of the Woodside Mills, a self- insurer. About 6:30 P. M. on April 7, 1949, while smoking in the yard of the mill, he was unintentionally struck in the left eye with a copper tube by a fellow employee. He lost the sight of this eye, which was later removed and an artificial eye inserted.

A claim for compensation was denied by the hearing Commissioner upon the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parrott v. Barfield Used PartsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Johnson v. T. B. Stewart Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Jordan v. Dixie Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. In Re Will of AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Allsep v. DANIEL CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Osteen v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Portee v. South Carolina State HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Dykes v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. Simmons v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API