Legal Opinion
Robertson v. Neuromedical Center
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1998No. 97-31169PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-Appellants (“the Robertsons”) sued the Defendants-Appellees, (collectively, “the NMC”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“the ADA”), as well as other state-law claims, alleging that the NMC had discriminated against Dr. Robertson in firing him. Robertson claims that the NMC failed to make reasonable accommodations for his Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”). The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the claims under the ADA, but remanded the Robertsons’ state-law claims, including a claim under the Louisianians with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- John R. Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Hamilton v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- David L. Hypes, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Child Sarah Hypes, and Megan Hypes v. First Commerce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Deas v. River West, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tom Zenor v. El Paso Healthcare System, Limited, Doing Business as Columbia Medical Center-East Columbia Medical Center-EastCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Gene A. Burch v. City of NacogdochesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Borgialli v. Thunder Basin Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Harville v. Texas A & M UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Robertson v. the Neuromedical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.