Legal Opinion
Harville v. Texas A & M University
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 8, 2011No. Civil Action No. H-10-1656PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. HOYT, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the Court is the defendants’, Texas A & M University (“TAMU”), Guy Mortensen, Dr. Kathryn Ryan and Jillaine Maes, motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 35). The plaintiff, Melissa Harville, filed a response (Docket Entry No. 38), to which the defendants replied (Docket Entry No. 39).1 After having carefully reviewed the motion, the responses, the record and the applicable law, the Court grants the defendants’ motion in its entirety.
II. Factual Background
The plaintiff was terminated from her…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James Hansen v. Fincantieri Marine Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Lonny Acker v. General Motors, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Garner v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Miles v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 500District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Crane v. Gore Design Completion, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.