Legal Opinion
Central Brooklyn Urban Development Corp. v. Copeland
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 18, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William Ritholtz, J.
In this nonpayment proceeding, respondent tenant moved to vacate and set aside a default judgment and warrant of eviction and for an order restoring the tenant to possession of the subject premises. The tenant, Mamie Copeland, prior to her eviction, resided in housing rehabilitated and subsidized by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the section 8 program. This program provides for rent subsidies to be paid to the owner by HUD, with the tenant paying the remaining portion, which in the instant case amounted to $111…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York City Housing Authority v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Swidler v. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Iltit Associates v. SternerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Third City Corp. v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Oppenheim v. SpikeNew York Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re W.A.S. Food Service Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- EBG Midtown South Corp. v. McLaren/Hart Environmental Engineering Corp. (In Re Sanshoe Worldwide Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Greenwich Gardens Associates v. PittNassau County District Court · 1984
- Nealy v. Southlawn Palms Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Brusco v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.