Legal Opinion
Greenwich Gardens Associates v. Pitt
Nassau County District Court
Decided December 24, 1984PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Fertig, J.
The respondent in this summary proceeding is a handicapped tenant in a rental unit owned by the petitioner, a private landlord. The issues raised are unique to tenancies in section 8 housing and some appear to be of first impression. Her rent is partially paid by Federal rent subsidies under the section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program for New Construction, which was established by Congress through enactment of section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. (See, 42 USC § 1437f.) The program is implemented by regulations promulgated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of New York v. Pennsylvania RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mitchell v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Central Brooklyn Urban Development Corp. v. CopelandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Swann v. Gastonia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1980
- Tubbs v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mora Development Corp. v. SandínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- Midland Management Co. v. HelgasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Lamlon Development Corp. v. OwensNassau County District Court · 1988
- Horizon Homes of Davenport v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Ambassador Realty Co. v. WachtelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.