Legal Opinion

Klemas v. Flynn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issue presented by this certified appeal is whether the double damages for wrongful withholding of security deposits, which may be recovered under R.C. 5321.16(C), are punitive damages and therefore may not be awarded by small claims divisions of municipal and county courts pursuant to R.C. 1925.02(A)(2). For the reasons stated below we determine that double damages may be recovered under R.C. 5321.16(C) in actions brought in small claims courts.

R.C. 5321.16(C) provides in relevant part:

“If the landlord fails to comply with division (B) of this section, the tenant may recover the property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Molzof v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Smith v. PadgettOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fidelholtz v. PellerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. ManocchioOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Germadnik v. AuldOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. McCullough v. Spitzer Motor Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Nieto v. MarcellinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API