Legal Opinion

State v. Manocchio

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2014No. 2013-0095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from the Eighth District, we determine whether a trial court may grant limited driving privileges nine years into a lifetime license suspension, notwithstanding former R.C. 4510.54(A), which prohibited the modification of a lifetime suspension for the first 15 years. The appellant, the state of Ohio, advances one proposition of law: “A trial court is without authority to modify a lifetime driver’s license suspension where defendant fails to meet the statutory criteria providing for modification as set forth under R.C. 4510.54.”

{¶ 2} At oral argument, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Klemas v. FlynnOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ManocchioOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wingfiled v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v.BiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Founders Ins.Co. v. GurungOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. Varholick, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
  5. Lakewood v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API