Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Spitzer Motor Center, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1996No. 68642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Dawn McCullough appeals from a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Spitzer Motor Center, Inc. (“Spitzer”) arising out of her fraud claim in the purchase of a “factory car.” The plaintiff contends that the court erred in directing a verdict on punitive damages, in ruling in limine that plaintiff could not introduce evidence of repairs, and in refusing to charge on the Consumer Sales Practices Act. We find no error and affirm for the reasons hereinafter discussed.

Plaintiff brought suit on February 8, 1988 in the common pleas court for fraud and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lang v. Beachwood Pointe Care Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Rieger v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Lang v. Beachwood Pointe Care Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Nevins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API