Legal Opinion

Smith v. Padgett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1987No. 86-1537PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

The parties and the courts below have recognized that this case requires the resolution of two distinct issues: (1) whether a lessee is competent to testify as to his or her opinion of the rental value of the leased premises, absent a showing of specialized knowledge of rental values in general; and (2) whether a landlord who wrongfully withholds a portion of a tenant’s security deposit is thereby rendered liable for double damages and reasonable attorney fees under R.C. 5321.16(C), where the landlord timely furnishes the tenant with an itemized list of deductions from the deposit pursuant to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Bishop v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Vardeman v. LlewellynOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Albreqt v. ChenOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Berlinger v. Suburban Apartment Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Amsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. City of Cincinnati v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Freeman v. Crown City Mining, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API