Legal Opinion

Butterworth v. Bredemeyer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1916No. 13237PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered January 22, 1915, in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried* to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant, who furnished goods and performed services for the funeral of J. A. O. Bredemeyer, deceased, upon the order of his surviving widow, Rea F. Bredemeyer, failed to comply with Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 1470 and 1472 (P. C. 409 §§ 335, 339), which require all claims against deceased to be presented for allowance or rejection within one year from the date of the first publication of notice to creditors. The lower court held that the claim is barred.

Appellant asserts that a claim for funeral expenses does not come within the provisions of the statutes. It is contended that the claim is not a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barto v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hildebrand v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dampier v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Gammage v. RatherTexas Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Jones v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Empson v. FortuneWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In re the Estate of JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Parchen v. HauschildWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API