Legal Opinion

Shifkowski v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2004No. 25770PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.

Frank Shifkowski (“Movant”) appeals from an order overruling his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 Movant contends he is entitled to relief because his appellate counsel on direct appeal provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly preserve and argue two issues relating to inculpatory post-arrest statements Movant made to police. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of statutory sodomy in the first degree and sentenced to a term of 20 years imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. Shifkowski, 57 S.W.3d 309…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. CORNELIOUS v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Burton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  3. State v. ChapmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Rogers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Donald Henningfeld, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API