Shifkowski v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.
Frank Shifkowski (“Movant”) appeals from an order overruling his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 Movant contends he is entitled to relief because his appellate counsel on direct appeal provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly preserve and argue two issues relating to inculpatory post-arrest statements Movant made to police. We affirm.
Movant was convicted by a jury of statutory sodomy in the first degree and sentenced to a term of 20 years imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. Shifkowski, 57 S.W.3d 309…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- CORNELIOUS v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Burton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
- State v. ChapmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rogers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Donald Henningfeld, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.