Legal Opinion
Perea v. Snyder
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1994No. 14556PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Cristobal Perea and Zenon Ramos (Plaintiffs), appeal an order of the district court which denied Ramos’ motion to reform a release and granted a motion for summary judgment directed against Ramos. We treat the motion to reform as Plaintiff Ramos’ showing in opposition to summary judgment. We affirm summary judgment as to Plaintiff Ramos but reverse and remand as to Plaintiff Perea. We affirm the denial of the motion to reform.
FACTS
On January 2, 1991, Plaintiffs, passengers on a farm labor bus owned by Defendant Maria Snyder and driven by Carlos Snyder,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spectron Development Laboratory v. American Hollow Boring Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hansen v. Ford Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Perea v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hoggard v. City of Carlsbad Ex Rel. ForrestNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lujan Ex Rel. Lujan v. Healthsouth Rehabilitation Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.