Legal Opinion
Novak v. CJ Grossenburg and Son
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1975No. File 11521PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice.
The claimant, Frank Novak, filed a proper claim on June 12, 1972, seeking to recover further compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for an injury to his back which occurred on January 15, 1969, while in the employ of C. J. Grossenburg and Son’s Shop (Grossenburg) of Winner, South Dakota. The Commissioner for the South Dakota Department of Labor and Management Relations (Commissioner) denied the claim on the grounds that the injury occurred in January 1969, and on December 11, 1969, the claimant signed a final receipt and release of Grossenburg and also of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of Beckwith v. SpoonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Rock's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Chittenden v. JarvisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Vodopich v. Trojan Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.