Hammond Lumber Co. v. Willis
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. H. Jolliffe, and R. L. Horton, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Bicksler & Smith, and Bicksler, Smith & Parke, for Appellant Maryland Casualty Company.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This case presents cross-appeals, one by the plaintiffs, the other by the defendant Maryland Casualty Company. The case is a companion case to that of Roystone Company v. Darling, L. A. No. 4072, decided on December 15, 1915, ante, p. 526, [154 Pac. 15]. The respective appeals are from different parts of the judgment.
The plaintiffs began actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens asserted by them, respectively, against the property of the defendant Mertz, for labor and materials furnished by them to the defendant Willis, the contractor, which were used in the erection of buildings on the premises…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Union Sheet Metal Works v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bird v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.