Legal Opinion

Vandermost v. Alpha Beta Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1985No. B007194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOSKY, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Anthony B. Vandermost appeals from the “Order For New Trial and the Final Judgment ... in favor of Defendants [Alpha Beta Company, doing business as Alphy’s Restaurants and Holly Brouwer] and against Plaintiff, following the granting of Defendants’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict in favor of Plaintiff.”

Contentions

Plaintiff contends on appeal that “(1) the trial court erred, abused its discretion, and prejudiced [him] by granting the judgment notwithstanding the verdict; (2) the order for new trial must be reversed and the jury verdict…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Boyd v. Racine Currency Exchange, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mostert v. CBL & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kentucky Fried Chicken of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Martinez v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Balard v. Bassman Event Security, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Bonner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API