Kentucky Fried Chicken of California, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We are asked to decide whether a shopkeeper owes a duty to a patron to comply with an armed robber’s demand for money in order to avoid increasing the risk of harm to patrons. The Court of Appeal held that such a duty exists. Petitioner Kentucky Fried Chicken of California, Inc. (KFC), disagrees and argues that the decision of the Court of Appeal conflicts with that in Vandermost v. Alpha Beta Co. (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 771 [210 Cal.Rptr. 613] (Vandermost).
We conclude that a shopkeeper does not have a duty to comply with the unlawful demand of an armed robber that property be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Boyd v. Racine Currency Exchange, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- John B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Verdugo v. Target Corp.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Morris v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.