Legal Opinion

Wittig v. Westar Energy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 9, 2010No. 102,746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Introduction

Westar Energy, Inc. promised in its Articles of Incorporation to advance attorney fees and expenses reasonably incurred by its officers and directors charged with a crime, sued, or the subject of a criminal or administrative investigation. If the company failed to make the advances within 30 days of the request and an officer or director was thereby forced to come to court to enforce this right of advancement, Westar promised to pay the expenses of that lawsuit as well. Westar breached this contract when it failed to advance fees reasonably incurred by David C. Wittig…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  5. Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of MouchagueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  2. Hewitt v. Kirk's Remodeling & Custom Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. Dun-Par Engineered Form Co. v. Vanum Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API