Legal Opinion

Dun-Par Engineered Form Co. v. Vanum Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 23, 2013No. 108,841Published

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, J.:

The Hanover Insurance Co. (Hanover) appeals the denial of its own motion for summary judgment and the granting *348of Dun-Par Engineered Form Company’s (Dun-Par) cross-motion for summary judgment. The district court granted Dun-Par’s claim to recover the unpaid balance due Dun-Par, a sub-sub-subcontractor, from the Subcontract Payment Bond bought from Hanover by the subcontractor, Vanum Construction Co., Inc. (Vanum). Hanover challenges the district court’s interpretation of tire definition of “Claimant” as set out in tire bond.

Because we find that Dun-Par does not meet the definition…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guardianship of the Person & Estate of Smith v. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Law v. Law Co. Building AssociatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Warner v. StoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Wichita Sheet Metal Supply, Inc. v. Dahlstrom & Ferrell Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Haynes Hardware Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API