Legal Opinion
Mootispaw v. Eckstein
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1996No. 1996-0777PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 383.] MOOTISPAW, APPELLANT, v. ECKSTEIN, PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE. [Cite as Mootispaw v. Eckstein,
1996-Ohio-389.] Mandamus to compel prosecuting attorney to investigate alleged fraud and collusion between relator’s attorney and an assistant prosecuting attorney in relator’s criminal convictions—Writ denied, when. (No. 96-777—Submitted July 10, 1996—Decided August 21. 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fayette County, No. CA96-02-004. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Rusty E. Mootispaw, is an inmate currently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mootispaw v. EcksteinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Scanlon v. ScanlonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brown v. Solon Pointe at Emerald RidgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Collier v. Libations Lounge, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.