Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Hass

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Three actions of tort, by the administrator appointed in this Commonwealth of the estate of Mary D. Hass, late of the town of West Stockbridge, for the alleged conversion of personal property belonging to the plaintiff as the administrator of that estate. Writs dated September 6, 1916. In the Superior Court the cases were heard together by Wait, J., upon an agreed statement of facts, containing the facts that are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Three actions of tort, by the administrator appointed in this Commonwealth of the estate of Mary D. Hass, late of the town of West Stockbridge, for the alleged conversion of personal property belonging to the plaintiff as the administrator of that estate. Writs dated September 6, 1916. In the Superior Court the cases were heard together by Wait, J., upon an agreed statement of facts, containing the facts that are stated in the opinion. In each of the cases the judge ruled that the plaintiff could not recover and found for the defendants. The plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

Mary D. Hass died on September 22, 1910; the defendants John D. Hass and Alma M. Hass are her children and the sole beneficiaries under her will. She was a resident of West Stockbridge in this Commonwealth and owned property in New York and in Massachusetts. A large portion of her estate consisted of her interest under the will of her husband, John D. Hass, senior, which had been proved in New York State; and she. *516as executrix, was carrying out the administration of his estate at the time of her death.

The original will of Mrs. Hass was filed and admitted to probate in the Surrogate’s Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Matter of Accounting of HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Wilkins v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Electric Welding Co. v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Rackemann v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Beardsley v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co. v. SpiveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. McCarron v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Wright v. MacomberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API