Legal Opinion

Rackemann v. Taylor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1910PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ksowltoh", C. J.

The fundamental question in this case is whether the petitioner for the probate of the will of Caroline E. Johnson, late of the city of New York, State of New York, deceased, shall be given an opportunity to establish the will, if he can, in the courts of Massachusetts, before it has been allowed in the domicil of the testatrix. The following facts, among others, are agreed:

The testatrix died at her home in New York, which was the place of her domicil, on April 24, 1908. She had not been domiciled in Massachusetts since her marriage in 1847. For sixty years she had resided in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Kimball v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. New Haven Horse Nail Co. v. Linden Spring Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Frothingham v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Walker v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Naab v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lenn v. RicheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API