Legal Opinion

Sam v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2008No. S-07-0057PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Steven Ace Sam (Sam), entered a plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. That plea was part of a negotiated plea bargain wherein he reserved his right to challenge the constitutionality of the search of his motor vehicle, which uncovered the evidence that incriminated him. The district court conducted a hearing in response to Sam’s motion to suppress the fruits of that search, which the State justified on the basis that it was conducted incident to his arrest for violation of a protection order and for driving while his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. DeShazer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fenton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Pierce v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Venegas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lefferdink v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. McGarvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API