Legal Opinion
State v. Padua
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 5, 2002No. AC 21186; AC 21187; AC 21245PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendants, Bethzaida Padua, Wilfredo Cálvente and Miranda Virgilia Cálvente, were each convicted after a joint trial before a jury following the search and seizure by the police of marijuana and other items under authority of a warrant executed in an apartment in a Willimantic public housing project. We affirm in part, and reverse in part, the judgments of the trial court.
The defendant Padua appeals from the judgment of conviction of (1) possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (b), (2) possession of a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. DaccarettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. PommerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. JeffreysConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.