Legal Opinion

Loxley v. Studebaker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This writ of error brings up a judgment of non-suit. The action was brought to recover commissions for the sale of a gas plant situated at South Bend, Indiana. The gas plant was the property of the South Bend Fuel and G-as Company. The defendants controlled and, with their family connections, owned the stock of the company. The plaintiff is a broker, having an office in Philadelphia.

*600On April 15th, 1903, Mr. Loxley, the plaintiff, wrote to Mr. George M. Studebaker, one of the defendants, asking him if he would consider a sale of the gas plant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Fultz v. WimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Stedman & Bowman v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Wilson v. SturgisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Terrance J. Velten v. Regis B. Lippert, Intercat, Inc., Intercat Pacific, Inc., Formerly Intercat, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Brenner and Co. v. PerlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. George Clift Enters. v. Oshkosh Feedyard Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Ramezzano v. AvansinoNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Miller v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API