Anglo American Mill Co. v. Wisconsin Hydro-Electric Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The only right which the plaintiff has to recover is that which it secured by the assignment from Ludwig. Its conditional-sale contract was not filed or placed on record, so that the Hydro-Electric Company had no notice of plaintiff’s claim upon the mill by virtue of its conditional-sale contract, even though such filing would have constituted notice to a purchaser of the real estate that the mill was personal property and not a part of the freehold. A consideration of the case, therefore, involves only the right of the tenant, Ludwig, to recover possession of the mill. Undoubtedly as between…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Second National Bank of Beloit, Wis. v. O. E. Merrill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Fitzgerald v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Preston v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomsen v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- People's Savings & Trust Co. v. Sheboygan Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Franzke-Schiffman Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. Topp Oil & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. Topp Oil & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933