Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. Topp Oil & Supply Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
There can be no question that the building and equipment were so attached to and so used in the operation of the business conducted on the premises as to become a part of the realty. Gunderson v. Swarthout, 104 Wis. 186, 80 N. W. 465; State ex rel. Gisholt M. Co. v. Norsman, 168 Wis. 442, 169 N. W. 429; Anglo American M. Co. v. Wisconsin Hydro-Elec. Co. 189 Wis. 120, 207 N. W. 276; Thomsen v. Cullen, 196 Wis. 581, 219 N. W. 439; Fuller-Warren Co. v. Flarter, 110 Wis. 80, 85 N. W. 698. Being a part of the realty, they belong to the owner of the fee, unless there be a rule of law applicable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Thomsen v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Gunderson v. SwarthoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Hansen Storage Co. v. BoddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Company v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- North Gate Corp. v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kalt-Zimmers Mfg. Co. v. Marine Nat. Exchange BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1933
- Myhre v. Michigan Silo Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936