Legal Opinion
Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Franzke-Schiffman Realty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :
Fowler, J.
The contract under which the bowling alleys in suit were sold by the plaintiff was a conditional sales contract within the meaning of the Uniform Conditional Sales Law contained in ch. 122, Stats. At the time of the enactment of that chapter the settled law of this state was as *664expressed by the following quotation from State ex rel. Gisholt M. Co. v. Norsman, 168 Wis. 442, 445, 169 N. W. 429:
“. . . When machinery adapted to the purposes of a manufacturing plant is installed therein and connected with the building by wires or belts,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Thomsen v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Anglo American Mill Co. v. Wisconsin Hydro-Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Schmidt v. DuBoisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cherry Bowl, Inc. v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- David G. Janes Co. v. WeedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Myhre v. Michigan Silo Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935