Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1899No. Crim. No. 517PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph P; Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant has been found guilty of an assault with intent to commit murder. He now claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

There is evidence in the record which tends to show that the defendant Watson, when somewhat under the influence of liquor, seized a boy about fifteen years of age, tied him by the neck to his (Watson’s) horse’s tail, using the hair of the horse’s tail for that purpose, then mounted his horse, and, with his pistol in his hand and threats to kill issuing from his mouth, rode about one-quarter of a mile, leading the boy. This journey was also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. LandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. GuidiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. CasserioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API