Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1892No. 20842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Rapa County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit murder, and now prosecutes an appeal to this court. The instructions asked by defendant and refused were substantially given in the charge of the court. Neither do we think the evidence was of the character upon which to predicate an instruction that the defendant could be convicted of a simple assault. He was either justifiable or guilty of a graver offense. (People v. Madden, 76 Cal. 521.) Again, if counsel desired such an instruction to be given, he should have requested the court to that effect.

It is insisted that the court erred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. Ong GitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. State v. WoodsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. StantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API