Legal Opinion

Williams v. Engen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2003No. S-10475PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Civil Rule 27 gives a court limited powers to order production of evidence for a legal action that has not yet been filed. The rule has usually been read to allow early production only to preserve existing evidence — not to discover whether evidence exists. John Williams believed that he might have a claim for misrepresentation arising from a real estate transaction and wanted evidence to confirm his suspicions and identify the prospective defendant. Relying on Rule 27, Williams asked for an order compelling a mortgage company to produce a report,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lombard's, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Paul Martin and Verla Martin v. Reynolds Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Mosseller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United States of America and the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Asher v. ALKAN SHELTER, LLC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API