Legal Opinion
Moore v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 2000No. S-8574PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Debra Moore bought a house on the Mata-nuska River, and insured it under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP, or “the Program”) through Allstate Insurance Company. Fearing her house would be condemned due to rising waters of the Matanus-ka River, Moore moved her house and filed for compensation. Moore received forty percent of the house’s market value. Asserting that she had been promised more, she sued Allstate and its agent in state court on a variety of claims, including misrepresentation and fraud. The superior court, holding that federal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Re Van Holt, Jo Van Holt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Sanford J. Berger v. Samuel R. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Harry Spence and Nancy Spence Fortner v. Omaha Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.